QUESTION 1:
If you had the chance would you utilize ICT (CALL) in your teaching?
If the opportunity is there, I would definitely utilize ICT in my teaching. It has been proven time and again that the usage of ICT garners better interest from students and the increase in interactivity on the student's part promotes more efficiency in the learning process. In addition, the use of ICT can save a lot of precious time and energy for the teacher and can induce better teacher and student contact level by utilizing blogs and emails in the learning process. In short, ICT in the classroom can truly streamline what was once a tedious and time consuming process by letting the teacher focus on what's important instead of worrying on other things.
QUESTION 2:
How do you think it would help (or would not help) your students to learn English?
I believe that the process of learning English can be made painless and interesting if we can find a way to stimulate the students' interest in the subject matter. The problem with this is a lot of students have an aversion towards learning English. Most of them have the misconception that English is a difficult language to learn and even though they can actually do better, their lack of self-confidence drags them down to a lower level than they can actually achieve.
From my experience, the ability to slowly make their own way in learning English with minimal supervision from the teacher is invaluable. A teacher's focused attention on a student can sometimes have an intimidating effect that actually hinders their learning. It also helps that using computers usually require the students to grasp some of the basics of the language as virtually all of the contents, be it in the Operating System or the World Wide Web is presented in English. My only reservation is the unfiltered nature of the Internet and this is where teacher supervision is really needed. Depending on the level of student, they may not know right from wrong and can easily be led astray by misleading information. Primary school students are certainly prone to this and they are also apt to pick up slangs or improper words from the Internet.
QUESTION 3:
What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of implementing CALL in the Malaysian schools?
It would be foolish not to admit that implementing CALL in Malaysian schools can help overcome the problems students are having in learning the language. As I have stated in the previous answers, the advantages are certainly numerous, better teacher-student interaction, more efficiency, freedom to explore, igniting the student's interest in the language; those are just some of the advantages.
However I have also noticed that the vast Internet is simply begging to be explored and it is easy to get sidetracked. Even at the university level, lecturers are having a hard time controlling the students in a computer lab with internet access. Some of them can be playing games, listening to music online, or god forbid, even chatting with their friends. Granted, there is the possibility of content filtering done by appointed network administrators such as the one done in UiTM labs that block non-academic contents, but the sheer size of the Internet makes it hard to be 100% effective.
For example, we can block access to a site that has Flash-based games in it, but some other sites are bound to slip through the net. This means that a class using CALL will also need careful monitoring to make sure the students are accessing relevant information, which actually defeats the main purpose of implementing CALL in the first place; requiring less attention from the teacher towards a specific student.
QUESTION 4:
What are the barriers in implementing CALL in the Malaysian classroom?
Malaysians have a wide variety of backgrounds. Having taught at a school in Shah Alam, I found that most of the students respond well to computer based learning as they are already computer literate and most of them have Internet access at home. However if CALL is to be fully implemented in the school system then the fate of students in rural areas will come into question. The imbalance in teaching tools available in rural areas compared to urban areas has been discussed many times over the year and this will only add another issue to the problem. It would not be unthinkable for this to be seen as widening an already considerable gap in standards at rural and urban schools.
What will become of the schools that are situated in areas with no Internet connection? Even worse, there might be schools out there that do not even receive steady power, water or phone connection (which entirely throws the possibility of having a computer lab out of the window). Moreover, providing a fully functioning computer lab is not simply buying a whole bunch of computers and putting them in a room together. There will be a need for trained staff for operating and maintaining the computers. In addition, if we are to concern ourselves with Intellectual Property laws, the expense on computer software can be astronomical and it might put a big dent in the annual budget for education which could have been put to better use elsewhere.
QUESTION 5:
Please also include any other comments/thoughts/ideas on this topic
In my personal opinion, implementing ICT in education can bring lots of benefits not only to the students but also to the teachers. If the opportunity is there, why not use it as a tool for teaching. It has been proven that students will become more interested towards the lesson if technology is used. It can save lots of precious time and energy for the teacher as well as their students.





